PCSK9 Inhibitors: For Which Patient And When?

Author

Reviewer

Share Article

Published on : April 06, 2023

(3)  (619)  

PCSK9 inhibitors: For Which Patient and When?

Author Reviewer

Shaun Goodman, MD, MSc

Co-Director, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta

Associate Head, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital 

Toronto, ON

Milan Gupta, MD, FRCPC, FCCS, CPC(HC)

Assistant Professor, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto
Medical Director, Canadian Collaborative Research Network
Brampton, ON 

 

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the number one cause of morbidity and mortality globally, accounting for approximately 1 in 3 deaths. This is largely due to atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), including myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke. Despite the apparent inevitability of ASCVD (if we live long enough!) and the enormous clinical burden, many ASCVD-related events are preventable. Indeed, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the most common modifiable CV risk factor with robust evidence from trials of lipid-lowering therapies demonstrating a clear, causal relationship between LDL-C lowering and ASCVD event reduction.

LDL-C Lowering: How are we doing in Canada?

Based on randomized clinical trials demonstrating CV event reduction, Canadian guidelines recommend a statin as first-line lipid-lowering therapy for LDL-C. However, observational findings have identified large gaps in the clinical care of ASCVD patients: Canadian real-world data (RWD) consistently shows that these patients do not achieve sufficient LDL-C reductions despite statin treatment. For example, only 1 in 2 ASCVD patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for coronary artery disease in Ontario had their LDL-C level measured within 6 months, despite the fact that more than 4 in 10 did not achieve LDL-C goals. Unsurprisingly, over the course of the next 3 years, those with LDL-C levels above the 2021 Canadian guideline-recommended threshold of 1.8 mmol/L had an increased risk for CV events. Thus, I have all of my ASCVD patients undergo lipid profile testing ~4 weeks after any change in LDL-C-lowering therapy, and as a minimum on an annual basis. Further, I attempt to intensify LDL-lowering therapy in those not getting to threshold.

What are the updates to the clinical approach to dyslipidemia?

Beyond Statins: The Efficacy and Safety of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin–Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibition

The role for non-statin LDL-C-lowering therapy, particularly among those patients unable to achieve guideline-recommended threshold despite statin, is now well established. For example, evolocumab is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits proprotein convertase subtilisin–kexin type 9 (PCSK9), usually administered with a simple auto-injector subcutaneously twice a month. Evolocumab lowers LDL-C levels by approximately 60% and confers important reductions in CV events. Remarkably, apart from 1 in 200 patients noting nuisance local injection site reactions (e.g., redness, itchiness, mild swelling), the tolerability and safety of evolocumab was indistinguishable from that of the placebo group over a 2-year follow-up period in a 27,500-patient trial. Further, there was a direct relationship between the lowest levels of achieved LDL-C and major CV outcomes. Conversely, there were no safety concerns with very low LDL-C levels reached with evolocumab. In conclusion, beyond the previous observations with high intensity statins that “lower is better”, the evolocumab outcome trial clearly demonstrated that “lowest is best”.

In an open-label extension study following the large evolocumab versus placebo outcome trial, extended treatment with evolocumab (in the group initially randomized to evolocumab) was safe, well-tolerated, and associated with fewer CV events and deaths when compared with delayed treatment with evolocumab (in the group initially randomized to placebo). Further, long-term achievement of lower LDL-C levels (down to <0.5 mmol/L) was associated with the lowest risk of CV events, with no safety concerns up to ~9 years.

How effective are PCSK9i at LDL-lowering in real world Canadian practice?

There has been relatively limited RWD describing the clinical characteristics of Canadian patients prescribed evolocumab. Thus, an observational study was conducted by Canadian clinical practitioners in their patients being initiated on evolocumab and followed-up as part of routine clinical care. Among patients with ASCVD and/or Familial Hypercholesterolemia (FH)--more than half of whom were already taking a statin and/or ezetimibe--the addition of evolocumab led to an impressive 60% relative lowering of LDL-C. Almost 8 in 10 patients achieved an LDL-C below the Canadian guideline-recommended threshold of 1.8 mmol/L. Thus, these RWD give us further confidence in the effectiveness of PCSK9 inhibition in real world Canadian practice.

Are PCSK9i as safe and well-tolerated as demonstrated in clinical trials?

The vast majority of Canadian patients in the real-world study did not experience an adverse event, and no injection-site reactions were reported. Approximately 1 in 6 patients discontinued evolocumab therapy over a 12-month period, with the most common reason being lack of reimbursement; thus evolocumab therapy persistence was greater than 90%. Thus, you can expect robust LDL-C reductions in patients receiving evolocumab, together with excellent tolerability and a favourable safety profile, similar to that demonstrated in clinical trials.

How has COVID-19 impacted Canadians with cardiovascular disease?

Which patients should receive PCSK9 inhibitors in real world practice?

The 2021 Canadian Dyslipidemia Guidelines have now made it clear that ASCVD patients already receiving a maximally tolerated statin dose but whose LDL-C is greater than 2.2 mmol/L (or apolipoprotein B [ApoB] is greater than 0.8 g/L or non-high density lipoprotein-cholesterol [non-HDL-C] is greater than 2.9 mmol/L), require a PCSK9 inhibitor. If the LDL-C is in the 1.8-2.2 mmol/L range (or ApoB 0.70-0.80 g/L or non-HDL-C 2.4-2.9 mmol/L), the patient could be first considered for ezetimibe, since the anticipated 15%-20% relative lowering with this therapy would potentially lower the atherogenic lipoproteins below the guideline-recommended thresholds (i.e., LDL-C <1.8 mmol/L, ApoB<0.70 g/L, non-HDL-C <2.4 mmol/L). However, if the addition of ezetimibe to maximally tolerated statin doesn’t achieve these thresholds, we should recommend adding a PCSK9 inhibitor. Finally, the guidelines have identified ASCVD patients who derive the largest absolute benefit from intensification of statin therapy with the additional use of a PCSK9 inhibitor, including those with: a recent (within the previous 1-2 years) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), recurrent MI, diabetes mellitus (or metabolic syndrome), polyvascular disease (i.e., vascular disease in 2 or more arterial beds; e.g., cerebrovascular or peripheral artery disease [PAD]), symptomatic PAD, previous coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG), an LDL-C ≥2.6 mmol/L or heterozygous FH, a lipoprotein(a) ≥60 mg/dL (120 nmol/L). Indeed, these types of patients at particularly high residual risk for CV events get the “biggest bang for the buck”—from both clinical and cost-effective perspectives--from PCSK9 inhibitor therapy.

The development of this blog was overseen by the Canadian Collaborative Research Network and was supported through an educational grant from AMGEN.

copyright © 2024 MDLearn
Any views expressed above are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the views of MDLearn.

Continue learning with MDRead

Published on October 10, 2023

Preparing for Fall: Insights on Respiratory Infection Prevention and COVID Vaccination Guidance

FALLING BACK FOR DAYLIGHT SAVINGS TIME, JUMPING AHEAD IN RES...

Published on May 31, 2023

Covid-19 Protection for High-Risk Populations

Covid-19 Protection for High-Risk Populations...

Published on May 22, 2023

Chronic Urticaria

Chronic Urticaria: That Unrelenting and Nagging Itch &nb...

Published on April 25, 2023

Allergic Rhinitis

The Birds and Bees and Allergies: The Forgotten Burden of...

Published on February 10, 2023

Osteoporosis Management in Primary Care – Sinking Your Teeth Into ONJ – Debunking Myths and Unde...

Sinking Your Teeth Into ONJ – Debunking Myths and Unde...

Published on January 25, 2023

Osteoporosis Management in Primary Care – Helping patients understand the risks and benefits of os...

Denosumab 101 Safety, Tolerability and Calcium Monitoring&...

Published on January 13, 2023

Osteoporosis Management in Primary Care – Identifying when to use anabolic therapies

Osteoporosis Management in Primary Care – Anabolic The...

Published on December 10, 2022

Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care

Dyslipidemia Management in Primary Care   This blog...

Published on December 06, 2022

Dietary Supplements

What advice do I give to my patients who use dietary supplem...

Published on October 13, 2022

Shingles Vaccination Keeping Pandora’s Box Closed

What has changed in terms of Herpes Zoster guidance and why...

Published on October 13, 2022

SOME CALL IT SLEEP

What’s New in Insomnia Management and Treatment &ld...

Published on September 16, 2022

When Plan B is Plan A… Meningitis B Vaccination

Meningitis B vaccination - a call to action. Why should Men...

Published on June 02, 2022

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Canadians with Cardiovascular Disease

What has been the impact of COVID-19 on Canadians with cardi...

Published on May 06, 2022

Hypertension- A Salty Topic

Why are we still talking about hypertension?   &nbs...

Published on March 31, 2022

I’m ready to use natriuretic peptide testing in my patients with dyspnea to diagnose heart failure...

How to incorporate BNP testing into primary care....

Back